Investors

Hypothetical financing snapshot

The wedge

EvidenceOS automates evidence capture, approvals, and binder generation for sanctions and CDD. We do not replace monitoring or sanctions data providers. Humans approve adverse actions.

Market and buyer

ICP: fintech compliance leaders, risk directors at mid-market banks, and payments compliance teams. Budget owner: compliance or risk operations.

Why now

Compliance workloads are growing while audit expectations rise. Evidence automation is the next step after security compliance platforms proved the model.

Business model and unit economics shape

Hypothetical ACV $60k to $250k. Expansion comes from more controls, more programs, and deeper retention tiers.

GTM plan

1. 0-6 months: design partners in sanctions and CDD.
2. 6-18 months: repeatable pilots and compliance playbooks.
3. 18-36 months: evidence platform narrative and bank expansion.

Moat candidates

• Evidence schema library and exception taxonomy.
• Retention metadata and binder formats.
• Integration depth across compliance systems.

Competitive landscape

Case management, AML suites, data vendors, and GRC platforms are adjacent. EvidenceOS wins on evidence integrity and binders.

Risks and mitigations

• Data access risk mitigated by staged integrations.
• Compliance risk mitigated by approvals and audit trail.
• Sales cycle risk mitigated by 30-day pilot scope.

Comparable companies and rounds

Next investor targets

• Nyca Partners - fintech compliance focus.
• Index Ventures - B2B workflow platforms.
• QED Investors - risk and payments expertise.
• Ribbit Capital - compliance infrastructure appetite.

Founders